Furniture of the Olden Time / Introduction


London: MacMillan & Co., LTD

“How much more agreeable it is to sit in the midst of old furniture like Minott’s clock, and secretary and looking-glass, which have come down from other generations, than amid that which was just brought from the cabinet-maker’s, smelling of varnish, like a coffin! To sit under the face of an old clock that has been ticking one hundred and fifty years — there is something mortal, not to say immortal, about it; a clock that begun to tick when Massachusetts was a province.”

H. D. Thoreau, “Autumn.”


THE furniture of the American colonies was at first of English manufacture, but before long cabinet-makers and joiners plied their trade in New England, and much of the furniture now found there was made by the colonists. In New Amsterdam, naturally, a different style prevailed, and the furniture was Dutch. As time went on and the first hardships were surmounted, money became more plentiful, until by the last half of the seventeenth century much fine furniture was imported from England and Holland, and from that time fashions in America were but a few months behind those in England.

In the earliest colonial times the houses were but sparsely furnished, although Dr. Holmes writes of leaving —

                                                               “The Dutchman’s shore,
With those that in the Mayflower came, a hundred souls or more.
Along with all the furniture to fill their new abodes.
To judge by what is still on hand, at least a hundred loads.”

If one were to accept as authentic all the legends told of various pieces, — chairs, tables, desks, spinets, and even pianos,— Dr. Holmes’s estimate would be too moderate.


The first seats in general use were forms or benches, not more than one or two chairs belonging to each household. The first tables were long boards placed upon trestles. Chests were found in almost every house, and bedsteads, of course, were a necessity. After the first chairs, heavy and plain or turned, with strong braces or stretchers between the legs, came the leather-covered chairs of Dutch origin, sometimes called Cromwell chairs, followed by the Flemish cane chairs and couches. This takes us to the end of the seventeenth century. During that period tables with turned legs fastened to the top had replaced the earliest “table borde” upon trestles, and the well-known “hundred legged” or “forty legged” table had come into use.

Cupboards during the seventeenth century were made of oak ornamented in designs similar to those upon oak chests. Sideboards with drawers were not used in this country until much later, although there is one of an early period in the South Kensington Museum, made of oak, with turned legs, and with drawers beneath the top.

Desks were in use from the middle of the seventeenth century, made first of oak and later of cherry and walnut. Looking-glasses were owned by the wealthy, and clocks appear in inventories of the latter part of the century. Virginals were mentioned during the seventeenth century, and spinets were not uncommon in the century following.

With the beginning of the eighteenth century came the strong influence of Dutch fashions, and chairs and tables were made with the Dutch cabriole


or bandy leg, sometimes with the shell upon the knee, and later with the claw-and-ball foot. Dutch high chests with turned legs had been in use before this, and the high chest with bandy legs like the chairs and tables soon became a common piece of furniture. With other Dutch fashions came that of lacquering furniture with Chinese designs, and tables, scrutoirs or desks, looking-glass frames, stands, and high chests were ornamented in this manner.

The wood chiefly used in furniture was oak, until about 1675, when American black walnut came into use, and chests of drawers, tables, and chairs were made of it; it was the wood oftenest employed in veneer at that time.

Sheraton wrote in 1803 : “There are three species of walnut tree, the English walnut, and the white and black Virginia. Hickory is reckoned to class with the white Virginia walnut. The black Virginia was much in use for cabinet work about forty or fifty years since in England, but is now quite laid by since the introduction of mahogany.”

Mahogany was discovered by Sir Walter Raleigh in 1595. The first mention of its use in this country is in 1708. Mr. G. T. Robinson, in the London Art Journal of 1881 says that its first use in England was in 1720, when some planks of it were brought to Dr. Gibbon by a West India captain. The wood was pronounced too hard, and it was not until Mrs. Gibbon wanted a candle-box that any use was made of the planks, and then only because the obstinate doctor insisted upon it. When the candle-box was finished, a bureau (i.e. desk) was


made of the wood, which was greatly admired, and as Mr. Robinson says, “Dr. Gibbon’s obstinacy and Mrs. Gibbon’s candle-box revolutionized English household furniture; for the system of construction and character of design were both altered by its introduction.” It is probable that furniture had been made in England of mahogany previous to 1720, but that may be the date when it became fashionable.

The best mahogany came from Santiago, Mexican mahogany being soft, and Honduras mahogany coarse-grained.

The earliest English illustrated book which included designs for furniture was published by William Jones in 1739. Chippendale’s first book of designs was issued in 1754. He was followed by Ince and Mayhew, whose book was undated; Thomas Johnson— 1758; Sir William Chambers — 1760; Society of Upholsterers—about 1760; Matthias Lock— 1765; Robert Manwaring — 1766; Matthias Darly— 1773; Robert and J. Adam — 1773; Thomas Shearer (in “The Cabinet-makers’ London Book of Prices “)— 1788; A. Hepplewhite & Co. — 1789; Thomas Sheraton — 1791-1793 and 1803.

Sir William Chambers in his early youth made a voyage to China, and it is to his influence that we can attribute much of the rage for Chinese furniture and decoration which was in force about 1760 to 1770.

Thomas Chippendale lived and had his shop in St. Martin’s Lane, London. Beyond that we know but little of his life. His book, ” The Gentleman’s


and Cabinet-Maker’s Director,” was published in 1754, at a cost of £3.13.6 per copy. The second edition followed in 1759, and the third in 1762. It contains one hundred and sixty copper plates, the first twenty pages of which are taken up with designs for chairs, and it is largely as a chair-maker that Chippendale’s name has become famous. His furniture combines French, Gothic, Dutch, and Chinese styles, but so great was his genius that the effect is thoroughly harmonious, while he exercised the greatest care in the construction of his furniture—especially chairs. He was beyond everything a carver, and his designs show a wealth of delicate carving. He used no inlay or painting, as others had done before him, and as others did after him, and only occasionally did he employ gilding, lacquer, or brass ornamentation.

Robert and James Adam were architects, trained in the classics. Their furniture was distinctly classical, and was designed for rooms in the Greek or Roman style. Noted painters assisted them in decorating the rooms and the furniture, and Pergolesi, Angelica Kaufmann, and Cipriani did not scorn to paint designs upon satinwood furniture.

Matthias Lock and Thomas Johnson were notable as designers of frames for pier glasses, ovals, girandoles, etc.

Thomas Shearer’s name was signed to the best designs of those published in 1788 in “The Cabinet- Makers’ Book of Prices.” His drawings comprise tables of various sorts, dressing-chests, writing-desks, and sideboards, but there is not one chair among


them. He was the first to design the form of sideboard with which we are familiar.

As Chippendale’s name is used to designate the furniture of 1750-1780, so the furniture of the succeeding period may be called Hepplewhite; for although he was one of several cabinet-makers who worked together, his is the best-known name, and his was probably the most original genius. His chairs bear no resemblance to those of Chippendale, and are lighter and more graceful; but because of the attention he paid to those qualifications, strength of construction and durability were neglected. His chair-backs have no support beside the posts which extend up from the back legs, and upon these the shield or heart-shaped back rests in such a manner that it could endure but little strain.

Hepplewhite’s sideboards were admirable in form and decoration, and it is from them and his chairs that his name is familiar in this country. His swell or serpentine front bureaus were copied in great numbers here.

His specialty was the inlaying or painting with which his furniture was enriched. Satinwood had been introduced from India shortly before this, and tables, chairs, sideboards, and bureaus were inlaid with this wood upon mahogany, while small pieces were veneered entirely with it. The same artists who assisted the Adam brothers painted medallions, wreaths of flowers or arabesque work upon Hepplewhite’s satinwood furniture. Not much of this painted furniture came to this country, but the fashion was followed by our ancestresses, who were


taught, among other accomplishments, to paint flowers and figures upon light wood furniture, tables and screens being the pieces usually chosen for decoration.

Thomas Sheraton published in 1791 and 1793, “The Cabinet-Maker and Upholsterer’s Drawing Book”; in 1803, his “Cabinet Dictionary”; in 1804, “Designs for Household Furniture,” and “The Cabinet- Maker, Upholsterer, and General Artist’s Encyclopedia,” which was left unfinished in 1807.

“The Cabinet-Maker and Upholsterer’s Drawing Book” is largely taken up with drawings and remarks upon perspective, which are hopelessly unintelligible. His instructions for making the pieces designed are most minute, and it is probably due to this circumstantial care that Sheraton’s furniture, light as it looks, has lasted in good condition for a hundred years or more.

Sheraton’s chairs differ from Hepplewhite’s, which they resemble in many respects, in the construction of the backs, which are usually square, with the back legs extending to the top rail, and the lower rail joining the posts a few inches above the seat. The backs were ornamented with carving, inlaying, painting, gilding, and brass. The lyre was a favorite design, and it appears in his chair-backs and in the supports for tables, often with the strings made of brass wire.

Sheraton’s sideboards are similar to those of Shearer and Hepplewhite, but are constructed with more attention to the utilitarian side, with sundry


conveniences, and with the fluted legs which Sheraton generally uses. His designs show sideboards also with ornamental brass rails at the back, holding candelabra.

His desks and writing-tables are carefully and minutely described, so that the manifold combinations and contrivances can be accurately made. Sheraton’s later furniture was heavy and generally ugly, following the Empire fashions, and his fame rests upon the designs in his first book. He was the last of the great English cabinet-makers, although he had many followers in England and in America.

After the early years of the nineteenth century, the fashionable furniture was in the heavy, clumsy styles which were introduced with the Empire, until the period of ugly black walnut furniture which is familiar to us all.

While there have always been a few who collected antique furniture, the general taste for collecting began with the interest kindled by the Centennial Exposition in 1876. Not many years ago the collector of old furniture and china was jeered at, and one who would, even twenty years since, buy an old “high-boy” rather than a new black walnut chiffonier, was looked upon as “queer.” All that is now changed. The chiffonier is banished for the high-boy, when the belated collector can secure one, and the influence of antique furniture may be seen in the immense quantity of new furniture modelled after the antique designs, but not made, alas, with the care and thought for durability which were bestowed upon furniture by the old cabinet-makers.


Heaton says: “It appears to require about a century for the wheel of fashion to make one complete revolution. What our great-grandfathers bought and valued (1750-1790); what our grandfathers despised and neglected (1790-1820); what our fathers utterly forgot (1820-1850), we value, restore, and copy!”




An 18th-Century Drawer

Despite temperatures in the 90s, yesterday, I picked up where I left off, completing the drawer for my side table. I added tails to the drawer sides, pins to the back.

Having put it off long enough, I marked the location of the pins in the carved drawer front, and started removing the waste. The piece of ash cooperated, and I ended up with some halfway decent half-blind dovetails. Not sure why I put it off for so long.

Then is was just a matter of gluing the parts together, inserting the bottom, and gluing the drawer runners in place. Voilà! One 18th-century drawer for my little side table.


After a bit of planing here and there… I had a perfect fit!

I’m in the home stretch. All I need is a shelf and a top. I’ve decided on a cherry shelf with an ash border. For the top, I’m thinking of having an ash border and cross-members with four cherry panels. I’m also considering a bit more carving on the top, perhaps, a thumbnail pattern and a few rosettes, we’ll see!

A Carver’s Platform

I stumbled upon this little gem, yesterday. Guess what’s been added to my to-do list?

Anthony Hay's, Cabinetmaker


In the natural course of things here at the Hay shop we only carve occasionally, but over the last few weeks it’s been the daily activity for Bill and I. That much bending over is fatiguing on the neck and back when working at normal bench height. After participating in a two week carving class working 12 – 13 hours a day, we were sold on the advantage of having the carving at elbow height. So before we started carving the side board for the up coming symposium, we joined together a pair of carving platforms.


The general form is based on a design by Steve Latta.  We modified materials and construction to be more period appropriate. The overall height of the platform is simply the difference between an individual’s working bench height and elbow height. The rails are tenoned through the stiles, glued and wedged.  Thick tenons on the top of the stiles are…

View original post 80 more words

Moving Forward

As predicted, I went with the 18th-century drawer construction. I like the look of half-blind dovetails.


After cutting and jointing the drawer sides from the resawn 1/4 inch alder stock from the other day, I marked and cut the tails, and cut 1/8 inch x 1/4 inch rebates to receive the drawer bottom.

The strips left from cutting the rebates will be used as drawer runners to secure the 1/8 inch bottom.


As it slowly reached 90°F in the shop, I stopped working having just cut the tails and rebates in the sides and the rebate in the front. I decided on a rebate versus a groove in the front due to the thin stock.


I made a little progress. Perhaps tomorrow morning, I’ll get the back and bottom cut, and start working on the pins. Let’s hope it doesn’t start out at 90°F.

WOW… What a Father’s Day!

Being estranged from your child is a gut-wrenching experience, but then I’m not sure estranged is the best word to use in describing the relationship between my daughter and me over the last 14 years. By definition, estranged is no longer close or affectionate to someone. Watching each other’s lives progress through the lens of Facebook, I just never felt that way. There we were doing our respective things, for the whole world, and each other, to see. Incommunicado is probably a better term. No comments were posted… no “like buttons” ever clicked… just observation from a distance.

Debbie Pincus, MS LMHC, a parent/marriage coach and founder of the Relationship Center, says, “Shutting a person out is a response to anxiety and confusion. Cutting off is a way people manage anxiety when they don’t know a better way. The love and caring is there; the ability to solve differences is not.”

We have all heard the old adage: “Time heals all wounds.” Time, combined with space, maturity and ideally, wisdom, allows us to perceive things differently. I think 14 years and 3000 miles gave us a chance to reflect, ponder, and evaluate to see more clearly. That situation that seemed like nothing good could come of it? Good riddance.

I also believe, besides all the time, distance, reflection, pondering, and evaluation, there needs to be a catalyst. Luckily for Gretchen and me, we married the perfect catalysts. After a recent life-changing event, Connie, my bride reached out to Gretchen, and planted a seed. Chata, my daughter’s wife, helped water that seed, which eventually grew into a most unexpected communique… “… I am sorry for the things that I have done to contribute to hurting… our relationship. I know I am a different person today than I was back then as I am sure you are too… I would love to talk… Love you.”

Might I say, I really do believe in the power of prayer!

Reconciliation occurs one person at a time, and it cannot be forced. We have to decide on our own whether it is time to reconcile and move on, and forward movement can only occur when the issues that gave rise to the conflict in the first place are addressed.


It was amazing to see how differently things became once Gretchen and I started to communicate. Truth be told, it was kind of embarrassing. It’s sad how the trivial bits we hang on to are allowed to become such huge chasms, tearing relationship apart.

Having spent the last few days unpacking lots of old baggage, Gretchen and I seem to have clear roads ahead. Thank you, Connie and Chata!

Now once I come back to earth, I’ll get back to work on my two-tier side table…

Perhaps Tomorrow

Time is an equal opportunity employer. Each human being has exactly the same number of hours and minutes every day. Rich people can’t buy more hours. Scientists can’t invent new minutes. And you can’t save time to spend it on another day. Even so, time is amazingly fair and forgiving. No matter how much time you’ve wasted in the past, you still have an entire tomorrow.

― Denis Waitley